Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1391

reference
509-tree-1
name
1391
tree-preservation-order

undefined

509-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023019 50.897896)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.022962 50.897890,-1.022965 50.897901,-1.022972 50.897911,-1.022985 50.897919,-1.023001 50.897925,-1.023018 50.897927,-1.023036 50.897925,-1.023052 50.897920,-1.023064 50.897912,-1.023073 50.897902,-1.023076 50.897891,-1.023073 50.897880,-1.023065 50.897870,-1.023053 50.897862,-1.023037 50.897857,-1.023020 50.897855,-1.023002 50.897856,-1.022986 50.897861,-1.022973 50.897869,-1.022965 50.897879,-1.022962 50.897890)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL